I hate writing a really long post, because I'm afraid it won't be read in its entirety. But, that being said, this one will probably be long.;)
For a couple of months now I have been reading a beautiful blog by a former atheist. She is now a Catholic wife and mother, and is a very thoughtful and wise woman. Although there are facets of Catholicism that contradict my faith, and would prohibit my conversion, I have been awed and challenged these past months by her writings, as well as her well-read, and very devout commenters. Growing up a Protestant, I never had the fortune of knowing any "real" Catholics. The ones I did know never went to mass, and had only one or two children. I thought that Catholicism had become a genetic trait, instead of a faith. I am extremely happy to learn, more and more each day, how very wrong my perception was.
I'm finding an issue that still comes up often among devout Catholics is that of birth-control (a topic almost completely swept under the rug by most Protestant denominations today). I want you all to read her absolutely gorgeous post on the matter, and then I will comment (and probably play devil's advocate some) below.
Ready?
I feel that I have an obligation to address this issue as the wife of an addict first, and as a Christian second. Even though, in reality, I am a Christian above all else. You see, from my perspective, Hubby's willingness to saddle me with children, even though at the time we conceived our second set he was planning to divorce me, and was being consistently unfaithful, was the most selfish thing he could do (even more-so than cheating). Being content with bringing forth life CAN come out of total connectedness, and unselfish love, OR it can come out of complete irresponsibility. I was doing so out of the former, while he was doing so out of the latter. In an marriage that is faithful in its entirety, "to implicitly say with every sexual act, 'It's OK with me if we should create a life together with this act.'" is one of the most romantic things I can think of. However, the most romantic thing in the world is to be fully faithful (in body, mind, and spirit), which few couples truly are, but every Christian couple should aim to be.
At this time, we are using spermicides in addition to NFP (I am morally opposed to the abortifacient quality of hormonal birth control). After all, how could I even think about bringing more children into this marriage at this point?! But, I have a deep desire to surrender all to God. Can I ever claim to fully seek this while withholding my womb? I have been losing sleep over this issue these last couple of weeks. Jesus can give me His answer with peace. Satan wants me to feel guilty and condemned. I am praying that Jesus will reveal His heart to me regarding this matter.
For now, I have a couple of thoughts. First of all, the issue of birth control didn't even come on the scene until the 1930s, so it's not surprising that this issue is not explained more fully in Scripture. We know that children are a blessing, and that God is the one who opens and closes the womb, but beyond that, we don't have any clear instruction.
Modern society is so vastly different than society has ever been before. Many difficulties are now presented in having a very large family that did not exist a hundred, even fifty years ago. For example, if we could all farm, we'd actually be better off financially by having a large family (more workers for the family business).
But, regardless of the difficulties presented, I do want to know what, if anything, the Bible has to say on the matter. I realize that those opposed to birth-control often use the story of Tamar and Onan as Biblical proof. Although it is obvious why this story may lead many to the conclusion that God is vehemently opposed to birth control, I actually read something quite different from it (I do acknowledge that there are many other scriptures that may suggest God's desire for us to leave such things to Him however.). Tamar has long since been a hero and of mine, and I long to meet her upon entering heaven. I wish that more information was included on her life, but much can be inferred from what is. First of all, she was in the direct lineage that led to the birth of Jesus. Second, she was deeply loved and heard by God. Lastly, she lived in favor with God.
How many fathers would like to strike down their sons-in-law, just because they are not good enough for their daughters? I know mine would! That is exactly what God did to Tamar's first husband. Er was a wicked man. God could have ended Er's life at any point, but his wickedness seems to have gone virtually unnoticed until his marriage to Tamar. I don't want to be too bold, but it very strongly appears that it was not acceptable to God that Tamar be married to an unrighteous man. Therefore, God killed him.
Er had a younger brother named Onan. According to law, Onan was to marry her, and conceive a child with her. However, the resulting child was to be thought of as Er's child. Onan, for whatever reason, did not want to father another man's child, so, he "spilled his semen on the ground". For this act, God then killed Onan as well. He practiced birth-control, and was killed! However, I truly believe that he was killed for disgracing Tamar, and not for practicing birth-control. If you read the rest of the story, which you should (it's one of the most fascinating stories in the Bible), you'll see that this special relationship between God and Tamar continues throughout her life. Also, I should note that if Onan knew to "pull out", this must have been a somewhat common practice. Yet, I cannot find any example of this being forbidden, or even mentioned, anywhere else in Scripture.
I would rather go the direction of no birth-control than the way of the pill however. This is because of its abortifacient quality of course, but is also because of the damage it has done to society. Again, from the perspective of the wife of a sex addict, it is easy to see how removing the possibility of pregnancy can and does change the meaning of sex, and makes premarital and extra marital sex more attractive. Sex is meant to feel good. If it wasn't, it wouldn't. But it is supposed to be so powerful, so chemically, emotionally, spiritually, and physically amazing, that it bonds two, and only two, people together for the rest of their lives. Of course the act cannot help to be more powerful if the possibility of creating life is attached. However, I have two very dear friends who just returned from their honeymoon. She will never be able to bear him children (because of cancer that resulted in a hysterectomy several years back). I am praying a very powerful sex life for them despite this fact. That might seem an odd thing to pray for, but, sex is the glue that God provided. Christians should all know how to apply it, in the context of marriage. Sex has to be beautiful apart from procreation. If not, marriages would end with menopause. And, of course, spouses should grow closer together, not further apart, with time and age.
In closing I have to add how extremely inspired I am by anyone who can hold to a difficult doctrine, even when the reality of its difficulty sets in. I have quite a few Protestant friends who at one point claimed to be opposed to birth control. Most changed their minds after one child.
Recent Comments